A serene watercolor illustration depicting a thoughtful individual sitting near a window, symbolizing introspection, emotional healing, and self-compassion.

Blaming Ourselves: Guilt, Emotional Absence, and the Psychological Defense of Omnipotence

December 16, 2024 - by Brian Sedgeley - in psychology

No Comments

Why Do We Blame Ourselves? The Impact of the “Dead Mother” and Early Caregiver Dynamics

In the realm of psychodynamic therapy, few concepts capture the complexity of human guilt and self-blame as powerfully as AndrĆ© Green’s Dead Mother hypothesis. This idea explores how early emotional unavailability in caregivers can shape our unconscious minds, creating enduring patterns of guilt, self-reproach, and psychological defenses that influence our adult lives. To deepen our understanding, it’s useful to examine the psychoanalytic distinctions between fantasy and phantasy, melancholia and mourning, and anaclitic versus introjective depression.


Fantasy vs. Phantasy: Unconscious vs. Conscious Constructs

One way to understand why we often blame ourselves for circumstances beyond our control lies in the difference between fantasy and phantasy.

  • Fantasy is a conscious or semi-conscious process—like imagining an ideal vacation or a better version of oneself. It is usually accessible and reflects our desires or fears in a straightforward way.
  • Phantasy, on the other hand, operates unconsciously and is deeply rooted in our earliest relational experiences. In Melanie Klein’s psychoanalytic theory, phantasies emerge as primitive mental constructs that help infants make sense of their emotional environment. These unconscious narratives shape how we perceive and interact with the world, especially when faced with complex or painful realities.

In the context of Green’s Dead Mother, a child may unconsciously phantasize that their caregiver’s emotional withdrawal is their fault. This belief serves as a defense mechanism, allowing the child to maintain an illusion of control over an otherwise incomprehensible and distressing situation. Although adaptive in early life, such phantasies can later manifest as chronic guilt and self-blame, even when they no longer reflect reality.


Melancholia vs. Mourning: The Weight of Unprocessed Loss

Freud’s seminal essay Mourning and Melancholia offers further insights into the psychological dynamics of unavailable caregivers.

  • Mourning refers to the healthy process of grieving a loss, where the individual gradually detaches emotional energy from the lost object and reinvests it elsewhere. This process allows for healing and growth.
  • Melancholia, however, is marked by an inability to process the loss fully. Instead of externalizing grief, the individual internalizes it, often turning anger, sadness, or frustration inward. This self-directed emotional turmoil can lead to feelings of worthlessness or inadequacy.

For children of emotionally unavailable caregivers—what Green calls dead mothers—melancholia often takes root because the loss is ambiguous. The caregiver is physically present but emotionally absent, leaving the child unable to fully mourn the loss. Instead, the child may blame themselves for the withdrawal, internalizing feelings of guilt and self-reproach that persist into adulthood.


Anaclitic vs. Introjective Depression: Two Faces of Loss

Sidney Blatt’s concepts of anaclitic and introjective depression shed further light on the psychological consequences of early caregiver unavailability:

  • Anaclitic depression arises from disruptions in attachment, manifesting as feelings of loneliness, helplessness, and an intense longing for connection. These individuals may struggle with dependency needs and a fear of abandonment.
  • Introjective depression, by contrast, stems from internalized self-criticism and feelings of failure or worthlessness. This type of depression is characterized by harsh self-judgment and an inability to feel adequate.

Children of dead mothers may experience a painful mixture of both. They long for the emotional connection they never received (anaclitic depression), while simultaneously blaming themselves for the caregiver’s absence (introjective depression). This duality often creates complex emotional struggles that can persist into adult relationships, careers, and self-perception.


Blame as a Defense Mechanism

Guilt and self-blame, while painful, serve as psychological defenses that protect against even more unbearable feelings of powerlessness. In phantasizing that they caused their caregiver’s emotional withdrawal, children maintain the illusion of control. This unconscious mechanism helps them avoid confronting the harsher reality: that the caregiver’s absence is beyond their control and not their fault. However, this defense mechanism often comes at a cost, perpetuating cycles of self-reproach and guilt long after the initial experience of loss.


How Therapy Helps Untangle the Roots of Guilt

In psychodynamic therapy, addressing these deep-seated patterns involves exploring both the conscious and unconscious narratives that shape a person’s emotional world. For example:

  • Working through phantasies: Therapy provides a space to identify and challenge unconscious phantasies of omnipotence and self-blame, helping individuals recognize that they are not responsible for their caregiver’s emotional withdrawal.
  • Mourning the loss: By revisiting and processing the loss of an emotionally available caregiver, therapy can help patients move from melancholia to mourning, allowing for emotional release and healing.
  • Balancing dependency and self-worth: Exploring the interplay between anaclitic and introjective tendencies enables patients to build healthier relationships with themselves and others.

A Call for Compassion

Understanding the dynamics of fantasy and phantasy, melancholia and mourning, and anaclitic versus introjective depression helps us see the profound impact early caregiver relationships have on our emotional development. These insights not only illuminate why we often blame ourselves but also offer pathways toward healing and self-compassion. By confronting these unconscious patterns, we can begin to release the guilt that no longer serves us and move toward a more fulfilling and balanced life.

Would you like help integrating these themes into your personal narrative or therapeutic approach? Reach out to learn how Bay Psychology Group, Inc. can help you explore these dynamics.

Dr. Brian S. Sedgeley, PsyD, a clinical psychologist and founder of Bay Psychology Group, Inc., wearing a brown sweater and checkered shirt, smiling warmly in a garden setting with soft lighting in the background.
President at  | Website |  + posts

Dr. Brian Sedgeley, is a clinical psychologist and the president and founder of Bay Psychology Group, Inc. a psychotherapy and psychological services clinic in Oakland CA.

Share this article

×

Make an appointment and we’ll contact you.

Appointment

IMPORTANT: It appears you may be in immediate crisis. Bay Psychology Group does not provide emergency services. Please do not submit this form.

Instead, contact 911, go to your nearest emergency room, or call 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline).

If this was selected in error, please go back and update your response before submitting.

āš ļø INTERNAL NOTICE: This referral includes a high-risk response. Please triage immediately and notify Dr. Sedgeley if appropriate.